| [19bc74] | 1 | /*
 | 
|---|
 | 2 |  * Project: MoleCuilder
 | 
|---|
 | 3 |  * Description: creates and alters molecular systems
 | 
|---|
 | 4 |  * Copyright (C)  2010 University of Bonn. All rights reserved.
 | 
|---|
 | 5 |  * Please see the LICENSE file or "Copyright notice" in builder.cpp for details.
 | 
|---|
 | 6 |  */
 | 
|---|
 | 7 | 
 | 
|---|
 | 8 | /**
 | 
|---|
 | 9 |  * \file tests.dox
 | 
|---|
 | 10 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 11 |  * Created on: Oct 28, 2011
 | 
|---|
 | 12 |  *    Author: heber
 | 
|---|
 | 13 |  */
 | 
|---|
 | 14 | 
 | 
|---|
 | 15 | /**
 | 
|---|
 | 16 |  * \page tests Automated Tests
 | 
|---|
 | 17 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 18 |  * There are two kinds of tests:
 | 
|---|
 | 19 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 20 |  *  \li \subpage codetest "Code tests"
 | 
|---|
 | 21 |  *  \li \subpage regressiontest "Regression tests"
 | 
|---|
 | 22 |  *  \li \subpage unittest "Unit test"
 | 
|---|
 | 23 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 24 |  * These behave more or less like top-down and bottom-up approaches to automated
 | 
|---|
 | 25 |  * testing. Tests are regarded here as a kind of contract. The code itself is
 | 
|---|
 | 26 |  * just one hand in two hands shaking, the other hand is resembled by the tests
 | 
|---|
 | 27 |  * that checks whether the code does exactly what it's supposed to do. Without
 | 
|---|
 | 28 |  * testing a larger project is impossible because it cannot evolve. With
 | 
|---|
 | 29 |  * increasing size, a project must be refactored
 | 
|---|
 | 30 |  * (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring) such that new code does not
 | 
|---|
 | 31 |  * have to wiggle itself around the same old issues that are present from the
 | 
|---|
 | 32 |  * start. Before one starts refactoring, it must be assured by some means that
 | 
|---|
 | 33 |  * the code before and after behaves the same with respect to its intended
 | 
|---|
 | 34 |  * functionality. These means are the tests.
 | 
|---|
 | 35 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 36 |  * Unit tests (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_testing) tests single
 | 
|---|
 | 37 |  * components (e.g. classes), dependencies on other classes are often just
 | 
|---|
 | 38 |  * mimicked via so-called stubs. These test whether a component always behaves
 | 
|---|
 | 39 |  * as desired.
 | 
|---|
 | 40 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 41 |  * Regression test (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_testing) on the other
 | 
|---|
 | 42 |  * hand test some specific functionality of the code from the top-most scope,
 | 
|---|
 | 43 |  * i.e. they are integration test that check whether the code eventually does
 | 
|---|
 | 44 |  * what's wanted. Lateron, they also check whether added or altered functionality
 | 
|---|
 | 45 |  * has not changed the outcome of older functions.
 | 
|---|
 | 46 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 47 |  * Note that all tests can be launched via
 | 
|---|
 | 48 |  * \code make check \endcode
 | 
|---|
 | 49 |  * in the top build directory.
 | 
|---|
 | 50 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 51 |  * \section Policy on launching tests
 | 
|---|
 | 52 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 53 |  * Note that the above run of \e all \e tests \e should \e pass for each and
 | 
|---|
 | 54 |  * every single test for each and every single commit in the code history before
 | 
|---|
 | 55 |  * it is pushed to the central repository (git has ample means via \a rebase for
 | 
|---|
 | 56 |  * correcting later found errors).
 | 
|---|
 | 57 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 58 |  * Before a version tag is given (e.g. v1.1.3) it is to be made sure that also
 | 
|---|
 | 59 |  * \code make distcheck \endcode
 | 
|---|
 | 60 |  * runs fine and produces a distributable archive.
 | 
|---|
 | 61 |  *
 | 
|---|
 | 62 |  */
 | 
|---|